COURT REPORT WOOLWICH CROWN COURT 24 JULY 2017 The Queen v Brian Pead The following report is based entirely on fact. How you choose to interpret those facts is entirely your personal responsibility. In the interest of justice, we include a short background to how these proceedings originated. At the conclusion you are invited to act in the interest of justice based on your level of personal responsibility. Brian Pead and Michael Bird (acting in the legal role of McKenzie Friend https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications/mckenzie-friends/) arrived in Court 5 at 10.03. Brian had travelled from King’s Lynn and Michael from Great Bentley near Clacton. Brian was rebuked for being “late”. He had been given no time for the hearing other than “a morning Hearing” – this evidence will be found in a recording of the previous Hearing of 17 July 2017. The purpose of the Hearing was for Brian to make an Application to Dismiss the Proceedings on the grounds of Abuse of Process. Knowing in advance (from years of experience of judicial corruption) that the Judge would not allow the application to … Continue reading
COURT REPORT WOOLWICH CROWN COURT 17 JULY 2017 R v BRIAN PEAD (3 counts of breaches of a bogus restraining order by contacting his daughter with information about Police corruption and child abuse in Lambeth) Brian Pead was forced to attend Woolwich Crown Court on 17 July 2017 by the Home Office mandarins who are grimly determined to cover up child abuse at Lambeth, aided and abetted by corrupt police officers. (Shades of Hillsborough). This is how the farce played out… On 14 June 2017, the Judge ordered the Prosecution to deliver up ALL first disclosure to Brian by 19 June. The Judge produced a list and gave a copy to the Prosecution and to Brian. So far so good. By 19 June 2017, the Prosecution delivered up only ONE piece of disclosure – a “witness statement” it was claimed to have been authored by his daughter. Thus the Prosecution FAILED in its duty to the Court and to the Defendant, in this case, Brian. But it gets worse… Ordinarily, any Defendant might have expected the Judge to (a) throw … Continue reading
On Monday 17 July 2017, Brian Pead will attend Woolwich Crown Court for another hearing in the ridiculous trial of breaches of a Restraining Order unlawfully issued on 01 November 2011 at Bexley Magistrates’ Court for the alleged harassment of [redacted] his daughter, by sending her a letter about police corruption and [redacted] his granddaughter, then aged 12, by sending her a birthday card. Your support in court to witness the demise of British Justice would be appreciated. Brian can be contacted on 07508 242 101, but the Secret Service are all over all forms of his communication and have been since he reported child abuse at Lambeth, so even if you try calling him, the call is likely to end up in the ether. Home Secretary Amber Rudd has been informed that no lawful RIPA warrant exists allowing such intrusion into Brian’s private and family life, but she couldn’t care less as she hunts fame and fortune. “There’s a Baroness in the making if ever I’ve seen one,” said Brian. “That type of award is given out to celebs, sports … Continue reading
Following (i) his claim v Lambeth Council for wrongful dismissal and an 11-year period of Harassment and (ii) his letter to the new Commissioner of Scotland Yard, Cressida Dick, now note the following reaction from “the authorities”: On 02 April 2017, Brian Pead was arrested at his present address by 4 officers in 2 vehicles. According to Chief Constable Simon Bailey, this is highly unusual: http://www.lynnnews.co.uk/news/tony-martin-slams-police-at-king-s-lynn-forum-meeting-1-7799813 Mr Bailey – who is reluctant to investigate child abuse at Glebe House School in Hunstanton, Norfolk, is often to be found bleating to the media about his lack of personnel and “ever-reducing budget” yet somehow manages to rustle up half his police force to arrest Pead or Martin. On 03 April 2017 Brian was interviewed by officers from the Met and charged with 3 new counts of the harassment of his daughter and eldest granddaughter. On 04 April 2017, a van took Brian from King’s Lynn to Bromley Magistrates’ Court for a 30-minute hearing before District Judge Dennis Lynch, who has been sitting on the southeast circuit since 2004 according to official records … Continue reading
28 February 2017 Re-submitted 24 March 2017 Cressida Dick Commissioner New Scotland Yard Dear Ms Dick, An Open Letter Re: Your Appointment and Other Matters Firstly, may I congratulate you on your appointment as Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service. What a remarkable moment in history we have with the confluence of a female Prime Minister, female Lord Chancellor, female Home Secretary and a female Commissioner. Nobody, of course, commented when males held all of those roles for centuries. I hope your appointment inspires my two granddaughters, now 18 and 15. You will have seen that, as the author of this letter, I have given it the status of an Open Letter. I believe you will understand why as you read on. I should also point out that throughout this letter, I make reference to an article by Tom Harper in The Sunday Times dated 26 February 2017 (page 6) entitled ‘Cool Cressida’s first case: the battered Yard.’ The article painted a sorry and somewhat disturbing picture of the current state of Scotland Yard. It refers to … Continue reading
On Friday 24 March 2017, Brian Pead entered his claim v Lambeth Council into Norwich County Court. The claim was for unlawful dismissal and harassment over an 11-year period. Full details of the claim to be posted at a later date.
Date: 27 January 2017 Venue: Knights Hill Hotel, King’s Lynn Attendees: Sir Henry Bellingham, MP [SHB]; Brian Pead (co-author of From Hillsborough to Lambeth and other books including FRAMED! and 10Prisons12Weeks and tony martin: the truth) [BP]; Satish Sekar (investigative author and journalist, see The Cardiff Three) [SS] Time: 18:00 – 19.28 SHB invited SS to tell him a little about himself. SS mentioned his work on The Cardiff Three. SHB asked SS if he was helping BP with his cases – SS agreed that he was. SS also mentioned Dr Michael Heath in the Tony Martin case. Brief discussion around the Tony Martin case and Heath’s autopsy on Fred Barras. SS mentioned the Fitted In project and said he was assisting BP in his injustices. SHB mentioned Lambeth Council, that it had been in the news a lot lately and SHB asked “What is your reading of how it affects your case Brian?” SHB said that Lambeth Council had admitted that they were involved in child abuse and cover-ups and that they were likely to be paying … Continue reading
The Justice4BrianPead.com website has been unlawfully removed by “The Authorities” determined to cover up paedophile activity by Lambeth Council officials. The website was originally removed from the WorldWideWeb and then disappeared altogether. They’ll stop at nothing to cover things up, won’t they?
To Lambeth Borough Council Subject Freedom of Information request – Investigation of Unlawful Dismissals Dear Lambeth Borough Council, I am re-investigating the unlawful dismissal of Brian Pead in 2007 for a second edition of the banned book FROM HILLSBOROUGH TO LAMBETH. Can you please tell me on what date Lambeth Council’s Cathy Twist (the lying investigation officer as described by Employment Judge Lindsay Hall-Smith and former MP Simon Hughes) became aware that Brian Pead had NOT been masturbated in the White Bear Theatre in Kennington in May 2006? Yours faithfully, Brian Pead
Dear Sir Henry, An OPEN LETTER re our constituency meetings Please note that my use of the word ‘corrupt’ in this letter accords with the definition as used by Professor Phil Scraton (University of Belfast) of the Hillsborough Independent Panel. Thank you for your email regarding our fifth constituency meeting on 27 January 2017 with investigative journalist Satish Sekar present. (A copy of this letter has been sent to him.) I note from your email that you are unwilling to approve a set of Minutes from that meeting, providing as a reason that you feel that you go into constituency meetings with a view to holding an open meeting where the participants can say whatever is on their mind and so on. It will, I am sure, come as no surprise to you that I find that comment completely disingenuous, since it provides you with a “Get Out of Jail” card in which you will not be held to account for the lack of any Actions that agreed to undertake in the meeting. I find myself unable to work on … Continue reading