Brian Pead issues unprecedented THIRD Official Complaint against HM Government
Brian Pead issues unprecedented THIRD Official Complaint against HM Government FOR THE ATTENTION OF HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN BORIS JOHNSON, PRIME MINISTER JEREMY CORBYN, LABOUR PARTY LEADER THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE THE HOME SECRETARY THE MINISTER FOR JUSTICE THE LORD BISHOPS TERRY WAITE THE COMMISSIONER OF THE METROPOLITAN POLICE IN LONDON And others… TAKE NOTICE THAT: the “conviction” against Brian Pead at Southwark Crown Court in December 2009 for the alleged attempted incitement of a 14-year-old girl who did not exist and whom the Prosecution and the Crown knew not to exist was fraudulently obtained and therefore void from the beginning; the Sexual Offences Prevention Order (SOPO) made against him was also fraudulent – it being founded on a fraudulent court case; any Notification Requirements as a “convicted sex offender” are equally bogus and fraudulent; the “conviction” against Brian Pead at the Bexley Magistrates’ Court in November 2011 for the alleged harassment of his daughter by sending her a letter about demonstrable corruption by the Met Police and Lambeth Council and his … Continue reading
Brian Pead forced to issue THIRD Official Complaint against the Queen under Article 3 of the ECHR
FOR THE ATTENTION OF HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN BORIS JOHNSON, PRIME MINISTER JEREMY CORBYN, LABOUR PARTY LEADER THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE THE HOME SECRETARY THE MINISTER FOR JUSTICE THE LORD BISHOPS TERRY WAITE And others… TAKE NOTICE THAT: the “conviction” against Brian Pead at Southwark Crown Court in December 2009 for the alleged attempted incitement of a 14-year-old girl who did not exist and whom the Prosecution and the Crown knew not to exist was fraudulently obtained and therefore void from the beginning; the Sexual Offences Prevention Order (SOPO) made against him was also fraudulent – it being founded on a fraudulent court case; any Notification Requirements as a “convicted sex offender” are equally bogus and fraudulent; the “conviction” against Brian Pead at the Bexley Magistrates’ Court in November 2011 for the alleged harassment of his daughter by sending her a letter about demonstrable corruption by the Met Police and Lambeth Council and his granddaughter (then aged 12) by sending her a birthday card was fraudulently obtained and therefore void from the … Continue reading
Essex Police and Brian Pead
Essex detectives found guilty of sabotaging child abuse investigations PUBLISHED: 16:19 14 March 2019 | UPDATED: 18:27 14 March 2019 Katy Sandalls Essex detective constables Sharon Patterson, 49, and Lee Pollard, 47, have been found guilty at the Old Bailey of sabotaging child abuse investigations. The couple, who live together in Colchester, both denied misconduct in a public office between 2011 and 2014. The two officers: forged documents forged Crown Prosecution Service forms forged witness signatures concealed evidence destroyed evidence lied about investigations to their superior officers made dishonest entries on the police force’s computerised recording system. In Brian Pead’s cases, the Met Police, Essex Police and Norfolk Police: forged documents forged Crown Prosecution Service forms forged witness signatures concealed evidence destroyed evidence lied about investigations to their superior officers made dishonest entries on the police force’s computerised recording system. All of Mr Pead’s claims can be fully substantiated with credible evidence (in other words, not fraudulently created/ not Photoshopped/ not forged). Brian’s MP, Sir Henry Bellingham, a former barrister for 8 years, has been presented with much of this … Continue reading
Daily Mirror in cover-up of police corruption in Tony Martin murder case
THE SUN COVERED UP POLICE CORRUPTION AT HILLSBOROUGH – THE DAILY MIRROR COVERS UP POLICE CORRUPTION IN TONY MARTIN MURDER TRIAL Yesterday (8th May 2019) the Chairman of the Tony Martin Action Group, Chris Schooling, telephoned Tom Hendry, claiming to be representing the Daily Mirror, about Norfolk farmer Tony Martin’s appeal against the alleged manslaughter of Fred Barras and the Wounding with Intent of Brendon Fearon in 1999. Both men were alleged to have been burglars at Mr Martin’s remote farmhouse when they were shot at Emneth. Here is a transcript of the conversation between Mr Schooling and the disingenuous Tom Hendry: Schooling Hello. I’m Chairman of the Tony Martin Action Group and I’m calling to inform you that we are assisting Mr Martin in his appeal against the convictions based on the depth of police corruption in the case. Hendry Do you know Brian Pead? Schooling What has that got to do with anything? Hendry Do you know Brian Pead? Schooling Of course I do. His book is excellent and exposes all the police corruption in the case. Hendry … Continue reading
Julian Assange and Brian Pead – similarities of State persecution
From the Independent 04 May 2019 Julian Assange: WikiLeaks founder given disproportionate sentence for ‘minor’ crime, UN legal experts claim Julian Assange was “disproportionate” sentence for a bail violation, the United Nations has said as it accused British authorities of breaching his human rights. The WikiLeaks founder was handed a 50-week sentence earlier this week and is being held at Belmarsh Prison in south-east London. He is fighting an extradition request made by the US over an alleged hacking conspiracy. The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention said it was deeply concerned about the “disproportionate” sentence and claimed that violating bail was only “a minor violation”. “The working group is further concerned that Mr Assange has been detained since 11 April 2019 in Belmarsh Prison, a high-security prison, as if he were convicted for a serious criminal offence,” it said. “This treatment appears to contravene the principles of necessity and proportionality envisaged by the human rights standards.” The panel added: “It is worth recalling that the detention and the subsequent bail of Mr Assange in the UK were connected to … Continue reading
Evidence of police corruption and abuse at Charing Cross police station
‘Corrupt’ Scotland Yard officers in drugs and sex inquiry The Evening Standard yesterday (30th April 2019) reported that: “A Scotland Yard unit tasked with fighting crime in the West End is at the centre of an inquiry into allegations of bullying, racism, drug use and perverting the course of justice. Up to 11 officers face claims of wrongdoing stemming from an inquiry by a watchdog which was triggered by reports that an officer had sex with a woman at Charing Cross police station. Most of the officers were on the Met’s West End Zone Impact Team, formed in 2014 to tackle night-time crime and violence around Leicester Square and Piccadilly Circus, which has now been disbanded. The Independent Office for Police Conduct today announced that the scope of the original inquiry had “widened considerably”. It said analysis of phone messages between officers had uncovered evidence of a number of serious allegations involving the police team at Charing Cross. The allegations include: Violence towards women and taking advantage of vulnerable people. Perverting the course of justice by deleting messages relevant to a … Continue reading
Brian Pead makes Official Complaint to Minister for Pensions
Dear Mr Opperman, An Open Letter re: (i) unpaid winter fuel payments; (ii) unlawful interference with my State Pension & Pension Credit; (iii) unlawful withholding of my Teacher’s Pension. I write to you in your capacity as Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Department for Work and Pensions. I also note from your website that you worked as a barrister for 20 years and I therefore believe that you are suitably qualified to address my Official Complaints. I should immediately make you aware that on 31st December 2013 and again on 4th February 2019, I issued Official Complaints against HM Government under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. These complaints have not been addressed which as a barrister, you will know, is a further direct breach of my rights and those of my family. I do not propose to regale with the full details which led me to take the step of initiating an Official Complaint against HM Government but instead to focus only on the way in which my Pensions have been unlawfully interfered with. You … Continue reading